Re: proposal #111
As the person who proposed the proposal, Jeff's intended resolution of the minor ambiguity by using GMT sounds perfectly reasonable to me.
I apologize for not noticing that the time stamps in the history log were adjusted to my time zone; I made the (incorrect) assumption that the history log was a static list generated based upon the time zone of the server.
In any case, it sounds like the minor ambiguity issue has been successfully resolved.
What does everyone think?
Should I leave the proposal as-is, to prevent additional delays in the vote, or should I retract and resubmit with the minor time-zone ambiguity made explicit?
Replies