Re: Recently accepted Proposal #62, potential game-breaking problem
Whomever makes the next proposal, please add the following to whatever you'd otherwise propose, and it'll fix the issue:
If a player arrives in the lowest numbered square on the board from the highest numbered square on the board, the player's "current direction of travel" is defined to be "bottom-to-top", as though the board "wrapped around" with the top row appearing just below the bottom row.
Otherwise, if the player arrives in the highest numbered square on the board from the lowest numbered square on the board, the player's "current direction of travel" is defined to be "top-to-bottom", as though the board "wrapped around" with the top row appearing just below the bottom row.
Otherwise, if the player arrives on a square as a result of any method of travel (warp bubble, jetpack, etc.) for which the current direction of travel is either indeterminate, or not limited by the rules to one of the four cardinal directions (top-to-bottom, bottom-to-top, left-to-right, or right-to-left), then the player's "current direction of travel" is defined to be in a random direction chosen upon arrival on that square.
Replies